MANPOWER - Values partly derived from the CIA World Factbook. As geography can play a role in both offensive and defensive wars, the GFP formula takes geographic qualities into account (border coverage, coastline coverage).ĬAPITAL - Basic details covering the name, population, temperature, and precipitation values of a given capital city. GEOGRAPHY - Values derived from the CIA World Factbook. This could be a similar situation to the Sprut, though I know very little about Russian military doctrine.Īnd again, if the Russians want to call the 2S25(M) a “tracked attack helicopter”, then it’s a damn tracked attack helicopter.FINANCIALS - Values partly derived from the CIA World Factbook and presented in USD ($). Just as the M18 and M36 have less armor and (at least the M18) had a weaker gun than the biggest opponents they faced, they were still highly effective due to how they were used. The Sprut was made to engage enemy tanks (and anything the infantry couldn’t do already), and it most likely can attack 3rd gen MBTs effectively (Challenger 2, Leopard 2A4, M1A2, etc.), especially if the M version has the T-90A loader, and this is due to tactics. vehicles being anything from a Toyota Hilux with an M2HB, to a fully fitted M1A2C.Īlso, “made to do X” and “it can actually do X” are 2 totally different things see Afghanit APS (the T-14 as a whole is kinda weird, but I do hope they can get it to work). I have to disagree the Sprut (as stated above, by Loooser) was created to be an amphibious (and air dropped?) vehicle that can engage and defeat enemy structures and vehicles.
The thing is that some people believe that Sprut was made for destroying MBTs, but it wasn't (this fact is mentioned in the article I quoted).
It's good that in other countries light tanks are not called "tank destroyers".
0 kommentar(er)
